Sterilizing the World of ‘Dumb’ People . . . Why It Won’t Work :: Argumentative Persuasive Intelligence Essays

Sterilizing the World of Dumb People . . . Why It Wont Work If we could just keep dumb mountain from having children, eventually there would be nonhing but smart people and this would be a better spatial relation. After reading this statement once and non really fully considering it, a lot of people may agree. At some point in their lives, many people may look at certain p arnts and their children and say, those people really should not be allowed to have children. Usually these thoughts are just thoughts, for who are we to say who can and cannot have children. However, what if a governing official proposed to sterilize everyone with less than an average IQ of 100. Would preventing dumb people from reproducing really make this world a better place? Is the status of our hunting lodge based on the intelligence of its people unsocial? The answer to solving the worlds problems and making this a better place to live are not that simple. There are many complex issues around d efining and measuring intelligence. Even if we knew for sure that only smart people make this place better, would sterilizing the dumb work? How important is it to take into account other things that may affect a persons development? Intelligence is influenced by the fundamental interaction of genetics, environment, and culture therefore, sterilizing people would probably not keep the world free of people with an IQ of less than 100. If the world were cleansed of dumb people, it would not guarantee a perfect world. Having a high IQ does not mean that a person will necessarily make this world a better place. Theodore Kaczynski, the Unabomber, had the IQ of a genius. He spent years of his life terrorizing, injuring, and killing people. On the other hand, just because a person has a low IQ does not mean they cannot make this a better place. Take, for example, the Forest Gumps of the world or the mentally challenged. They may not be very smart on what our parliamentary proced ure subjectively calls intelligence, but they may bring joy and purpose to someone elses life. Making this world a better place is not something left-hand(a) strictly up to the intelligence of the people in it. Anyone supporting the government officials proposal is assuming that peoples intelligence alone causes the condition of the world, and there is no proof of this.